Showing posts with label Dick Cheney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dick Cheney. Show all posts

Friday, October 8, 2010

BUSINESS CONFERENCE, OR PLATO'S CAVE? (replay)

*****************************

Eight months ago, in February, I penned an article on the Bakersfield Business Conference for Bakersfield Express, which I posted here. The Bakersfield Business Conference is scheduled for tomorrow. Below I'm reposting what I presented back in February in it's entirety. As for me, I'll be in the Bay Area tomorrow. Enjoy.

*****************************

 In “The Republic,” Plato imagined a world filled with people living in a dark cave. Their eyes were capable of seeing only silhouettes and were permanently fixed to a cave wall. They could not see the events and objects that created the shadows. When one of the cave dwellers emerges to take a look at the real world, his senses are overwhelmed. For Plato, it was the duty of the elite, or enlightened leaders, to educate those bewildered by the shadows on the wall, and the events that created them.

Herein lies the problem that plagues our world. What happens when the leaders are as equally clueless about the shadows on the walls as Plato’s cave dwellers? It looks like we’re going to find out at this year’s Bakersfield Business Conference, to be held Oct. 9 on the campus of California State University, Bakersfield.

Traditionally, the BBC has been a conservative cheer leading-fest. This year’s BBC is no different. Rudy Giuliani, Michael Steele, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Sarah Palin, Mitt Romney, and more shadow talkers are scheduled to appear.

There are many shadows to talk about on our cave wall. There are the “dark paranoia” shadows. This explains Dick Cheney’s invitation. There are the “smoke and mirror” shadows. Welcome Karl Rove. And then there are the “ignorant and stupid” shadows that dance about on the walls more than the others. These, one would assume, will be covered by Sarah Palin.



What the Shadow Talkers are here to do is explain a world they don’t really understand because, quite frankly, it doesn’t really exist. Put another way, they’re here to explain market fairytopias and the demons that haunt their souls. Let’s take Dick Cheney.

He’s been getting virtually everything wrong about our enemies since the Cold War. For example, during the 1980s he was speaking about the durability and threat that an omnipotent Soviet Union posed to the United States – right up to the moment that its empire collapsed. Oops.

Then there were the many Russian and Eastern European threats that existed when the Bush administration arrived in Washington. The Bush administration wanted to dispense with treaties on weapons, and was on pace to reignite the Anti-Ballistic Missile defense program (aimed at Russia and China). This was to be the centerpiece of the Bush administration’s defense program. Then 9/11 happened. Oops, again.

Then Dick Cheney claimed that Saddam Hussein was the bad guy we needed to fear because he had weapons of mass destruction. We all know how that went.

Dick Cheney has a legacy of getting the world wrong, and the coordinators of the BBC think he actually has something meaningful to say to our nation’s myopic cave dwellers? (Cheney is also famous for claiming “deficits don’t matter.” But that’s another story.)

Then we have Sarah Palin. Or, as Cenk Ugyr from The Young Turks might put it, we have “the irrefutable stupidity of Sarah Palin.” (Don’t get ahead of me on this one; keep reading).

Now, we could discuss how Sarah Palin didn’t know that Africa is a continent, or that the players in the North American Free Trade Agreement are the U.S., Mexico and Canada. Then there’s that famous ABC Moment when she had no clue about the Bush Doctrine (it’s about preemption), or the bailout proposal. I could also discuss Sarah Palin and her position on Intelligent Design. I won’t say anything more than to remind everyone that the Flintstones isn’t a documentary.

But what’s really disturbing about inviting Sarah Palin to our regional cave convention is her complete and utter disregard for the historical record, and how her rhetoric is at odds with her reality. Let’s consider what she supported while she was in her Alaskan cave, and how her life is more socialistic and tied to the redistribution of wealth than anything President Obama has ever concocted.

Consider this little nugget. Alaska ranks number three nationally when it comes to what its citizens pay out in federal taxes, and what it receives from the federal government. For every dollar Alaskans pay into the system, they take $1.84 out. Put another way, Alaska’s hardened sense of “rugged individualism” is really built on a foundation of communal welfarism, direct from the American taxpayers in the lower 48.

This probably explains why Alaskans have come to see oil within their borders as a form of community property. Big oil in Alaska must send the state a check for every barrel they pull out of the ground. The state then turns around and redistributes the wealth. In 2008, for example, Sarah Palin and the federal government watched over a system that distributed $3,269 per Alaskan citizen ($1,200 of this came from a resource rebate program). This adds up to just under $20,000 for the Palin family. While each Alaskan is scheduled to receive only $1,305 for 2009 we shouldn't lose sight of the fact that this money falls into each Alaskan's lap for no other reason than the state embraces a wealth distribution policy that many rugged individualists claim to despise (wink, wink).

With that much money from the Feds and Big Oil you would think someone might inform Alaska’s cave dwellers about their socialist tendencies. Not Sarah Palin. Instead of calling it the “Redistributing the Wealth Because We’re Really Communists Fund” – as Sarah Palin might call it if President Obama suggested the same program nationally – the state of Alaska calls it the “Permanent Fund Dividend.” Just more shadows.

Does anyone think Palin’s going to explain her shadows at our regional cave convention? Imagine what would happen if she carried her redistributive message to oil-laden Kern County. But the chances of this happening are about as good as Dick “Chicken Little” Cheney explaining how his five deferments make him a true patriot.

We now live in a country where Christian Fundamentalists believe that abortion is bad, but war and the death penalty are to be exalted.

We now live in a country where people believe it was OK for Ronald Reagan to almost triple our national debt, and for George W. Bush to more than double it. But President Obama is a big spender because he inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit (that's ballooned to $1.6 trillion), a sinking economy, and two bungled wars.

We now live in a country where compassion has more to do with condemning the poor while we provide America’s wealthy with government escorted profits and bailout dollars that reach into the trillions of dollars.

These shadows need explaining.

Instead, Dick Cheney and Sarah Palin are going to explain the silhouettes they see on the wall, as they want to see them. Palin’s a rugged individualist. Cheney’s a warrior-nationalist. Forgive me for saying this, but I think we are better off in the dark.

- Mark

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

BUSINESS CONFERENCE OR PLATO'S CAVE?

If you don't live in Bakersfield you'll find it interesting to know that at one time our city regularly hosted a conference that was part of Bakersfield's "to do" list. I attended one year, and was impressed by it's size and scope. A virtual - and impressive - tent city was erected on the California State University Bakersfield campus, which helped bring in mega speakers and guests from around the world. Even though the Small Tent speaker list made it appear to be a bi-partisan event, the mega-star list of conservative speakers for the Big Tent made it clear who the event was really for (being inside the Big Tent made it clear as well). The conference was halted a few years back but it is scheduled to appear again this year. I recently wrote an article for Bakersfield's newest on-line media effort, Bakersfield Express. Below is my perspective on the conference, with necessary budget and financial updates. Enjoy.

*****************************
 In “The Republic,” Plato imagined a world filled with people living in a dark cave. Their eyes were capable of seeing only silhouettes and were permanently fixed to a cave wall. They could not see the events and objects that created the shadows. When one of the cave dwellers emerges to take a look at the real world, his senses are overwhelmed. For Plato, it was the duty of the elite, or enlightened leaders, to educate those bewildered by the shadows on the wall, and the events that created them.

Herein lies the problem that plagues our world. What happens when the leaders are as equally clueless about the shadows on the walls as Plato’s cave dwellers? It looks like we’re going to find out at this year’s Bakersfield Business Conference, to be held Oct. 9 on the campus of California State University, Bakersfield.

Traditionally, the BBC has been a conservative cheerleading-fest. This year’s BBC is no different. Rudy Giuliani, Michael Steele, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Sarah Palin, Mitt Romney, and more shadow talkers are scheduled to appear.

There are many shadows to talk about on our cave wall. There are the “dark paranoia” shadows. This explains Dick Cheney’s invitation. There are the “smoke and mirror” shadows. Welcome Karl Rove. And then there are the “ignorant and stupid” shadows that dance about on the walls more than the others. These, one would assume, will be covered by Sarah Palin.


What the Shadow Talkers are here to do is explain a world they don’t really understand because, quite frankly, it doesn’t really exist. Put another way, they’re here to explain market fairytopias and the demons that haunt their souls. Let’s take Dick Cheney.

He’s been getting virtually everything wrong about our enemies since the Cold War. For example, during the 1980s he was speaking about the durability and threat that an omnipotent Soviet Union posed to the United States – right up to the moment that its empire collapsed. Oops.

Then there were the many Russian and Eastern European threats that existed when the Bush administration arrived in Washington. The Bush administration wanted to dispense with treaties on weapons, and was on pace to reignite the Anti-Ballistic Missile defense program (aimed at Russia and China). This was to be the centerpiece of the Bush administration’s defense program. Then 9/11 happened. Oops, again.

Then Dick Cheney claimed that Saddam Hussein was the bad guy we needed to fear because he had weapons of mass destruction. We all know how that went.

Dick Cheney has a legacy of getting the world wrong, and the coordinators of the BBC think he actually has something meaningful to say to our nation’s myopic cave dwellers? (Cheney is also famous for claiming “deficits don’t matter.” But that’s another story.)

Then we have Sarah Palin. Or, as Cenk Ugyr from The Young Turks might put it, we have “the irrefutable stupidity of Sarah Palin.” (Don’t get ahead of me on this one; keep reading).

Now, we could discuss how Sarah Palin didn’t know that Africa is a continent, or that the players in the North American Free Trade Agreement are the U.S., Mexico and Canada. Then there’s that famous ABC Moment when she had no clue about the Bush Doctrine (it’s about preemption), or the bailout proposal. I could also discuss Sarah Palin and her position on Intelligent Design. I won’t say anything more than to remind everyone that the Flintstones isn’t a documentary.

But what’s really disturbing about inviting Sarah Palin to our regional cave convention is her complete and utter disregard for the historical record, and how her rhetoric is at odds with her reality. Let’s consider what she supported while she was in her Alaskan cave, and how her life is more socialistic and tied to the redistribution of wealth than anything President Obama has ever concocted.

Consider this little nugget. Alaska ranks number three nationally when it comes to what its citizens pay out in federal taxes, and what it receives from the federal government. For every dollar Alaskans pay into the system, they take $1.84 out. Put another way, Alaska’s hardened sense of “rugged individualism” is really built on a foundation of communal welfarism, direct from the American taxpayers in the lower 48.

This probably explains why Alaskans have come to see oil within their borders as a form of community property. Big oil in Alaska must send the state a check for every barrel they pull out of the ground. The state then turns around and redistributes the wealth. In 2008, for example, Sarah Palin and the federal government watched over a system that distributed $3,269 per Alaskan citizen ($1,200 of this came from a resource rebate program). This adds up to just under $20,000 for the Palin family. While each Alaskan is scheduled to receive only $1,305 for 2009 we shouldn't lose sight of the fact that this money falls into each Alaskan's lap for no other reason than the state embraces a wealth distribution policy that many rugged individualists claim to despise (wink, wink).

With that much money from the Feds and Big Oil you would think someone might inform Alaska’s cave dwellers about their socialist tendencies. Not Sarah Palin. Instead of calling it the “Redistributing the Wealth Because We’re Really Communists Fund” – as Sarah Palin might call it if President Obama suggested the same program nationally – the state of Alaska calls it the “Permanent Fund Dividend.” Just more shadows.

Does anyone think Palin’s going to explain her shadows at our regional cave convention? Imagine what would happen if she carried her redistributive message to oil-laden Kern County. But the chances of this happening are about as good as Dick “Chicken Little” Cheney explaining how his five deferments make him a true patriot.

We now live in a country where Christian Fundamentalists believe that abortion is bad, but war and the death penalty are to be exalted.

We now live in a country where people believe it was OK for Ronald Reagan to almost triple our national debt, and for George W. Bush to more than double it. But President Obama is a big spender because he inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit (that's ballooned to $1.6 trillion), a sinking economy, and two bungled wars.

We now live in a country where compassion has more to do with condemning the poor while we provide America’s wealthy with government escorted profits and bailout dollars that reach into the trillions of dollars.

These shadows need explaining.

Instead, Dick Cheney and Sarah Palin are going to explain the silhouettes they see on the wall, as they want to see them. Palin’s a rugged individualist. Cheney’s a warrior-nationalist. Forgive me for saying this, but I think we are better off in the dark.

- Mark

Sunday, January 3, 2010

DICK CHENEY: SUFFERING FROM "POLITICAL TOURETTES"?

MSNBC's Ed Schultz and Rep. Eric Massa (a former naval commander) go after Dick Cheney (and the Republican Party) for being cowards. Dick Cheney, according to Rep. Massa, suffers from political tourettes syndrome.



Rachel Maddow also goes after Dick Cheney for being the hypocrite and coward that he is.



Why Republicans respect and follow Dick Cheney is a mystery to me. Why Americans believe that Republicans have a handle on war and terror - after watching President Bush and VP Cheney wage war like the political incompetents they are - is simply befuddling.

- Mark

Saturday, October 31, 2009

THE CHENEY LIE MACHINE ...

Why in the world is Liz Cheney seen as a legitimate voice, on anything?



More on Liz Cheney's lies (and her dad's failed memory) ...



- Mark

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

THIS MODERN WORLD

This just seems so Dick Cheney ... and Rush Limbaugh ... and FOX News ... and

Click on the picture if you can't read the letters.

- Mark

Friday, June 5, 2009

DICK (UNCUT)

Jon Stewart of the Daily Show takes former VP Dick Cheney to task for his selective memory and stunning accusation that Richard Clarke, "missed" the signals that 9/11 was coming. What an idiot. Anyone who knows anything about pre-9/11 Washington knows that Richard Clarke was so obsessed with an impending attack that he asked high level Washington agency heads to cancel their vacations during summer 2001. Clarke even thought about resigning his counter terrorism post during summer 2001 because he felt he was the only one in Washington seeing things.

The Daily Show With Jon StewartM - Th 11p / 10c
Dick (Uncut)
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorEconomic Crisis


- Mark

Sunday, May 31, 2009

DICK CHENEY ... A LIAR AND A COWARD

In yesterday's program I made it clear, once again, that former VP Dick Cheney is a liar and a coward. Cheny's five deferments during the Vietnam War and his constant whining about being scared are proof of his cowardice. I should have carried the discussion through to chronicle Dick Cheney's lies and distortions, but we were running out of time. I'm fixing that now.

In this McClatchy News article ("Cheney's speech ignored some inconvenient truths") Jonathan S. Landay and Warren P. Strobel outline ten lies that Dick Cheney made during his "national security" presentation. Here's their take on one of them:

[Cheney] quoted the Director of National Intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair, as saying that the information gave U.S. officials a "deeper understanding of the al Qaida organization that was attacking this country."

In a statement April 21, however, Blair said the information "was valuable in some instances" but that "there is no way of knowing whether the same information could have been obtained through other means. The bottom line is that these techniques hurt our image around the world, the damage they have done to our interests far outweighed whatever benefit they gave us and they are not essential to our national security."
More specifically, Cheney was trying to conflate torture with saving lives from imminent attack by saying that the current Director of National Intelligence (who oversees the CIA, the FBI, and the other 14 intelligence gathering agencies we have) agrees with him on the effectiveness of torture.

Landay and Strobel point out that Cheney ignored that a "top-secret 2004 CIA inspector general's investigation found no conclusive proof that information gained from aggressive interrogations helped thwart any 'specific imminent attacks' ... ". Cheney also ignored that in December FBI Director Robert Mueller told Vanity Fair magazine that he didn't think that the techniques disrupted any attacks.

There's more lies and distortions so I encourage you to read the Landay and Strobel piece. Why anyone would want to listen to this coward is beyond me. I also encourage you to read Frank Rich's, "Who Is to Blame for the Next Attack." Rich makes it abundantly clear that it won't be President Obama.

- Mark

Thursday, May 21, 2009

CHENEY'S COWARDLY RESPONSE

Holy Paranoia Batman! Take a look at the fear-drenched nonsense that Dick Cheney just presented to the Republican Party’s “research” arm, the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). Here's the first problem: setting.

Dick Cheney can no longer go to applaud-guaranteed military bases to make scare-mongering speeches. So he has to go to places like AEI to make presentations that would, in all likelihood, be mocked and jeered in just about any other public setting. But we'll leave this one alone for the moment.

If you decide to take the time to read Dick Cheney’s extraordinarily long and self-serving speech what you will find is (1) a man who is focused on reliving 9/11 through eternity, and (2) a man who has no problem lying and leaving out key points that undermine the Bush administration’s claims, especially as they apply to national security. In a few words, Dick Cheney is a liar (see his WMD and al-Qaeda/Saddam-links comments) and a coward (five deferments when it was his turn to serve tells us this).

For me, this Cheney comment tells us what the former Vice-President has to say is baseless and drenched in self-serving hypocrisy …

"Releasing the interrogation memos was flatly contrary to the national security interest of the United States. The harm done only begins with top secret information now in the hands of the terrorists, who have just received a lengthy insert for their training manual. Across the world, governments that have helped us capture terrorists will fear that sensitive joint operations will be compromised. And at the CIA, operatives are left to wonder if they can depend on the White House or Congress to back them up when the going gets tough."
Look, once the Bush administration – through Dick Cheney’s office – released the name of CIA asset Valerie Plame to teach her husband (Ambassador Joe Wilson) and others a lesson about what would happen if they crossed the administration Dick Cheney lost all moral standing when it comes to judging the actions of others in the area of national security. This is especially the case when the Obama administration is charged with trying to clean up the Bush administration’s mess caused by their unethical and illegal behavior.

Then we have this nonsense from Dick Cheney ...

"That attack itself was, of course, the most devastating strike in a series of terrorist plots carried out against Americans at home and abroad. In 1993, terrorists bombed the World Trade Center, hoping to bring down the towers with a blast from below. The attacks continued in 1995, with the bombing of U.S. facilities in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; the killing of servicemen at Khobar Towers in 1996; the attack on our embassies in East Africa in 1998; the murder of American sailors on the USS Cole in 2000; and then the hijackings of 9/11, and all the grief and loss we suffered on that day."
Where do I begin? The simplest response here is that the Bush administration didn’t do anything after they were briefed by outgoing National Security Advisor, Sandy Berger, and Counterterrorism Czar, Richard Clarke (who served Reagan, Bush I, and Clinton) made it clear that al Qaeda "would be your number one priority" during their tenure in office. They even ignored Richard Clarke, who was running around Washington DC during summer 2001 telling agency heads to cancel summer vacations because "something big" was going to happen. Then we have George W. Bush ignoring the CIA briefing titled "Bin Laden Determined to Attack U.S." ...

The Bush administration had ample warning. They blew it. We were attacked on their watch in spite of their knowledge that "a series of terrorist plots" had occurred and top officials had told them that another one was coming. Saying we had to get tough because an attack occurred on their watch is akin to saying, "We need everyone to be afraid so they forget that we blew it."

There's more. Much more. But going through all Dick Cheney's nauseatingly long "let's-all-be-afraid-because-we-were-afraid" speech is a bloodletting experience we don't need to run through. The fact is, Dick Cheney has a history of cowardice and getting things wrong.

Cheney had his chance, and he helped make America weaker with his actions. He needs to let the adults clean up his mess.

- Mark

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

JESSE VENTURA: CHENEY'S A "COWARD"

Via Dailykos, former Minnesota Governor and Navy SEAL Jesse Ventura has some blunt commentary about the previous White House and torture ...



In case you can't watch the full interview (but I suggest you do), here's a couple of Ventura's comments.

Ventura on Cheney avoiding service during the Vietnam War: "Clearly, he's a coward. He wouldn't go when it was his time to go."

Ventura on torture & waterboarding: "It's a good thing I'm not president ... I would prosecute every person involved in that torture. I would prosecute the people that did it. I would prosecute the people that ordered it. Because torture is against the law."

Ventura on former President George W. Bush: "the worst president of my lifetime. Barack Obama inherited something I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy."
- Mark

Thursday, June 19, 2008

WAR PROFITEERING & THE REPUBLICAN CULTURE OF DECEIT

By way of Dailykos …

A few months back the Boston Globe broke the story of Dick Cheney’s former firm, Kelly Brown & Root (formerly of Halliburton) contributing to the Republican fed culture of deceit and corruption. In a few words, KBR avoided paying hundreds of millions of dollars in Social Security and other taxes by claiming that more than 21,000 employees worked for a Cayman Islands subsidiary that had neither a phone number, nor an office (although it did exist in a computer file in the Cayman Islands).


Here’s what the Boston Globe wrote:

Kellogg Brown & Root, the nation's top Iraq war contractor and until last year a subsidiary of Halliburton Corp., has avoided paying hundreds of millions of dollars in federal Medicare and Social Security taxes by hiring workers through shell companies based in this tropical tax haven.

More than 21,000 people working for KBR in Iraq - including about 10,500 Americans - are listed as employees of two companies that exist in a computer file on the fourth floor of a building on a palm-studded boulevard here in the Caribbean. Neither company has an office or phone number in the Cayman Islands.

The Defense Department has known since at least 2004 that KBR was avoiding taxes by declaring its American workers as employees of Cayman Islands shell companies, and officials said the move allowed KBR to perform the work more cheaply, saving Defense dollars.
Sure, the practice of off-shoring a firms business to avoid paying taxes isn’t illegal. It’s just shameful. And in this case, war profiteering (like this case) and tax-dodging slaps every American soldier and U.S. taxpayer in the face. And did I mention that KBR has no bid contracts that help provide it with 8 times the amount of work than its nearest competitor?

Fortunately Senator Kerry and Senator Obama jumped on this story. They just forced President Bush to sign legislation effectively closing this Cayman Island loophole. Beachmom from Dailykos has been following the story and has all the links here.

My only question now is whether we can get President Bush to sign on to legislation that will ask KBR to retroactively pay back the taxes they dodged over the years with their war-profiteering activities.

Think about it. If the Bush administration can fight for “retroactive immunity” for his telecom buddies (who illegally helped the government spy on Americans) they should also be prepared to support “retroactive tax responsibility” for his war-profiteering buddies … don’t you think?

- Mark

Friday, April 18, 2008

NDI: IRAQ, "A MAJOR DEBACLE"



By way of SusanG I found this report "Choosing War: The Decision to Invade Iraq and Its Aftermath (PDF). It's from the National Defense Institute, which is billed as the Pentagon's "premier educational institute." The opening line sets the tone:

Measured in blood and treasure, the war in Iraq has achieved the status of a major war and a major debacle.
The analysis, for the Bush administration, doesn't get much better after that.

Globally, U.S. standing among friends and allies has fallen. Our status as a moral leader has been damaged by the war ... At the same time, operations in Iraq have had a negative impact on all other efforts in the war on terror, which must bow to the priority of Iraq when it comes to manpower,materiel, and the attention of decisionmakers. Our Armed Forces — especially the Army and Marine Corps — have been severely strained by the war in Iraq. Compounding all of these problems, our efforts there were designed to enhance U.S. national security, but they have become, at least temporarily, an incubator for terrorism and have emboldened Iran to expand its influence throughout the Middle East ...
The reasons things haven't gone well are tied to 5 overarching assumptions made by the Bush administration that proved to be both wrong and based largely on "wishful thinking."

1. The fighting would end in a "climactic battle."

2. We would be welcomed with "sweets and flowers."

3. There would be no "score settling" because Iraqis hungered for democracy.

4. Iraq would be able to fund the war.

5. The troops would receive help from Iraqi police, the Iraqi Army, and state ministries.
More than wishful thinking, what stands out in this report is how prevalent willful ignorance was in the run up to war.

... much of the postinvasion state of affairs had been predicted. Many government and civilian experts had spoken well and loudly about the dangers of postwar Iraq, but their warnings were not heeded.
This is a well written and extremely accessible assessment of what happened in the lead up to war. It points enough fingers for us to see that George Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleeza Rice, and Donald Rumsfeld will likely go down as Historical Incompetents, on many levels.

- Mark

Thursday, April 17, 2008

INTERESTING ... WHO'S THE REAL PATRIOT?

After hearing President John F. Kennedy's challenge to, "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country," a young African-American gave up his student deferment, left college, and voluntarily joined the Marines.

Keep in mind that he did so at a time when he and his family could not be seated or fed in restaurants across the American south. Yet, he chose to abandon an educational opportunity that was not always available to African-Americans to serve his country. Here's his story, as told in the Chicago Tribune:

"In 1963, this man, having completed his two years of service in the Marines, volunteered again to become a Navy corpsman. (They provide medical assistance to the Marines as well as to Navy personnel.)

The man did so well in corpsman school that he was the valedictorian and became a cardiopulmonary technician. Not surprisingly, he was assigned to the Navy's premier medical facility, Bethesda Naval Hospital, as a member of the commander in chief's medical team, and helped care for President Lyndon B. Johnson after his 1966 surgery. For his service on the team, which he left in 1967, the White House awarded him three letters of commendation ...

... While this young man was serving six years on active duty, Vice President Dick Cheney, who was born the same year as the Marine/sailor, received five deferments, four for being an undergraduate and graduate student and one for being a prospective father. Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, both five years younger than the African-American youth, used their student deferments to stay in college until 1968. Both then avoided going on active duty through family connections."
The article continues by asking, "Who is the real patriot? The young man who interrupted his studies to serve his country for six years or our three political leaders who beat the system? Are the patriots the people who actually sacrifice something or those who merely talk about their love of the country?"


This is a good question. We'll discuss it this Saturday.

- Mark

P.S. For those of you who haven't already figured it out, I'll let you know who the Navy corpsman was during the program [it's Rev. Jeremiah Wright]

Sunday, March 23, 2008

MEANDERING IGNORANCE & THE DRAFT

During Dick Cheney's interview with ABC's Martha Raddatz on the war in Iraq last week Raddatz pointed out: "Two-thirds of Americans say it's not worth fighting, and they're looking at the value gained versus the cost in American lives, certainly, and Iraqi lives."

Ever so thoughtful, Dick Cheney responded: "So?"

While this is yet another example of what happens when arrogance and indifference merge in the minds of the painfully mediocre, it's Cheney's response to another Raddatz question that walks away with my Meandering Ignorance award.

RADDATZ: "What sacrifice have most Americans made?"

CHENEY: Well, I think they've been asked to support the effort and the enterprise. But it's not the kind of thing, for example, where you would have wanted to institute a draft. We've got an all-volunteer force; it's one of our great assets, one of our great national assets. I suppose you could have created a sense of sacrifice if you'd gone back to the draft, but that would have, in my opinion, done serious damage to the state of our military. We built a volunteer force because that was a decision we made 30 years ago, and it's been a very good -- a good decision.
Where do I start? How about with this: "We built a volunteer force because that was a decision we made 30 years ago ..." does not explain why we went to an all volunteer military. It's kind of like George Bush saying "I lied about the reasons for going into Iraq because I didn't tell the truth ..."

Cheney's response is truly as ignorant an answer as you can get when it comes to explaining the "sacrifices" America is making in a war that Cheney has compared to World War II. And, for the record, the reason we went to an all volunteer military is because the economist studying whether we should get rid of the draft willfully ignored Congress.

Specifically, Congress wanted to know how much more the country would have to pay in recruitment costs, public relations, higher wages, better benefits, privatization, etc. if we went to an all volunteer military. The economist went out of his way to use his own methods, and argued that people not working in the private sector because they were drafted into the military meant lost national income. His methods weren't questioned (and no one took the time to ask if he was injecting his own political views) so the Gates Commission adopted the proposal. We dropped the draft in 1973. The economist? Milton Friedman.

- Mark

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

RISING TO 'THE LEVEL OF THEIR INCOMPETENCE'

Remember David Walker? In his position as the GAO's Comptroller General, which is charged with insuring financial transparency, he requested information on Vice-President Dick Cheney's energy task force (only to be turned away). Then, as our country’s chief accountant, he became a tenacious financial watchdog, warning we are ignoring threats to our nation’s long-term fiscal security with continued record budget deficits. Well, he's finally given up and quit.

In other good news that augers well for transparency and fiscal responsibility, effective March 1 the Bush administration’s Department of Commerce starts playing more fiscal games and will shut down its extremely useful and popular economic indicators site because of “budgetary constraints.”

Imagine that ... We have a recession ramping up. We get more record budget deficits. Consumer confidence is down. And Team Bush decides we don’t need easy access to the data that allow us to better understand our financial state of affairs. The investor site Angora Financial says it best:
Funny how that works, eh? Bush proposes the first-ever $3 trillion budget this year, but there’s not enough porked in to keep a stats Web site running.
Forcing good people out ... and we can't even keep a good web site running. This explains why even Conservatives are starting to acknowledge that the only people now surrounding President Bush are those who have the unique ability to "rise to the level of their incompetence."

Is this any way to run a country?

- Mark

Thursday, December 13, 2007

INTERESTING QUESTION ...


Is Dick Cheney's Portfolio an Impeachable Offense?








The Daily Reckoning asks this question after Kiplinger's magazine ran with the headline, "Cheneys betting on bad news?" No matter what you want to believe on how the Cheney's investment portfolio is structured, both pieces raise interesting questions.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

MORE NONSENSE FROM CHENEY ...

Remember Dick Cheney’s famous prediction that the insurgency was in its “last throes"? If my math is correct, that would make a “throe unit” about 2 ½ years because the insurgency is still going strong. Now we have this. Cheney claims that by the middle of Jan. 2009 Iraq will be a democracy. Specifically,

… it will be clear that “we have in fact achieved our objective in terms of having a self-governing Iraq that’s capable for the most part of defending themselves, a democracy in the heart of the Middle East, a nation that will be a positive force in influencing the world around it in the future.”

There you have it. America spends blood and treasure to a tune of well over $1 trillion and – civil war or no civil war – Iraq gets Cheney’s “gold star” Award of Confidence. Using Cheney’s benchmarks of civil war, and thousands dead, makes the Sudan a fledgling democracy, right? (Just asking).

And isn’t it convenient that Bush and “Throe Unit” Cheney will be out of the White House by January 2009. By predicting democracy in Iraq by January 2009 both can then pass the buck and claim "We had Iraq on track for democracy by now ... you guys blew it."