Saturday, March 7, 2015

THE FERGUSON STORY THAT KEEPS ON GIVING


According to The Guardian, Ferguson, Missouri Judge Ronald Brockmeyer owes the U.S. government more than $170,000 in federal taxes. Here's the interesting part. Brockmeyer regularly jailed impoverished defendants who could not pay fines of one or two hundred dollars, and was unveiled this past week by the Department of Justice as the "driving force behind Ferguson's strategy of using its municipal courts to aggressively generate revenues" for the city.

One city council member was told that if Brockmeyer were no longer on the bench that the city would have to consider the revenue effect.

Brockmeyer is also named in the DOJ report as part of a larger group of white Ferguson officials who allegedly wrote off citations for themselves and friends, while punishing residents for similar offenses.

An influential Ferguson city clerk and two city police officers have already been fired for fixing tickets and racist emails. One of the fired officers was linked to an email that suggested Barack Obama would not be in office long because 'what black man holds a steady job for four years?'.

barack and michelle obama

You can read the judges story here.

- Mark 

Friday, March 6, 2015

LOVE HAS NO ...

Interesting art form ... Love has no labels.


- Mark 

FRIDAY READING (3-6-15)


Injured workers suffer as 'reforms' limit workers' compensation benefits (NPR).

Climate change helped fuel the Syrian conflict, new paper finds (Huffington Post).

Gas industry's solution for toxic wastewater: spray it on icy roads (Newsweek).

The best explanation of redistricting (gerrymandering) you will ever see (Washington Post).


JUST INTERESTING
Behold, the bike cave (Ozy).

DEA warns of stoned rabbits if Utah passes medical marijuana (Washington Post).

Bank of Canada urges 'Star Trek' fans to stop 'Spocking' their fivers (Dangerous Minds).

And the Darwin Award goes to ... The drunk guy who let another drunk guy shoot a trash can off the top of his head. Oops (Addicting Info).

New map shows Koch's connection to Keystone (Nation of Change).


TRADE NEWS
Obama's Trans-Pacific Partnership rhetoric resembles Clinton's on NAFTA (Truth Out).

Dishonest White House attack on Sen. Warren (D-MA), who's exposing sham behind secret panel on trade deals (Truth Out). 

Despite FATC, U.S. companies stash $2.1 trillion abroad (Forbes).


HEAD SCRATCHERS
More people have been killed in America by non-Islamic domestic terrorists than jihadists (Vice / Southern Poverty Law Center).

Incredible ... Texas lawmaker on his fifth marriage files complaint against judge over same-sex marriage (Daily Kos).


NETANYAHU'S SPEECH
Chris Matthews livid after Netanyahu's speech: GOP assisted 'takeover attempt' by a foreign government (Raw Story).

Democrats on Netanyahu's speech: Bibi's never seen a war he doesn't want the U.S. to fight (Slate).

There it is ... Ted Cruz compares Obama to Neville Chamberlain and Iran to Germany (Slate).

Half of American voters think that inviting Israeli PM was a bad idea (Daily Mail).


OBAMACARE NEWS
Two Red States that embraced Obamacare have seen their uninsured rates plummet faster than anywhere (Huffington Post).

Obamacare sign-ups reach 6.4 million (Hufington Post).

GOP Gang of Supremes goes after Obamacare (Nation of Change).


MISCELLANEOUS
In Ferguson, DOJ probe only confirms what community has long known (Nation of Change).

Bill O'Reilly's cavalcade of lies: A handy collection of the damage - so far (News Corpse).

California orders oil companies to stop drilling near drinking water supplies (Nation of Change).

Private prison companies foresee increased profits as ruling limits immigration detentions (Truth Out).

Department of Justice finds pervasive racial bias at Ferguson Police Department (Mother Jones).

- Mark 

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

IRAN ALREADY HAS THE ABILITY TO BUILD NUCLEAR WEAPONS ... SO, YEAH, CONGRESS WAS A PROP


Graham Allison has an interesting review of Iran's nuclear capabilities and Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech in front of Congress. He makes two points:

1. Prime Minister Netanyahu has presented the U.S. Congress and the American people with a "false dichotomy." 
2. Iran already has nuclear capabilities.

With reference to Netanyahu's false dichotomy, Allison makes it clear that 20 years of hard-line "maximalist demands" with Iran, which reject potential agreements out of hand, have not worked. Specifically, by drawing lines in the sand over the past two decades Allison argues that we have put Iran in a take it or leave it position that has helped push them to aggressively piece together the capacity to put together a nuclear program. 

The result? Iran has advanced from being "10 years away from producing a bomb to only months." 

Hence Netanyahu's strident either-or "bad deal, good deal" is not based in reality because it suggests we have no other option than to confront Iran - as if the strategy bore fruit in the past.


As Allison points out, the "tipping point" came in 2008 when "Iran mastered the technical know-how to build centrifuges and operate them to enrich uranium to levels required for the core of a nuclear bomb." He wrote at the time, "Iran has crossed the threshold that is painful to acknowledge but impossible to ignore: it has lost its nuclear virginity." 

The only real issue the amount of time it would take to produce a the enriched uranium necessary for a nuclear bomb.

Netanyahu's national security adviser acknowledged as much in 2009 when he commented that "Iran has the ability to complete the cycle of nuclear fuel production on its own; the point at which it has all the elements to produce fissionable material without depending on outsiders. Iran is now there." 

Today we're left with an Iranian state that has a nuclear capacity that "cannot be erased." Because the nuclear genie cannot be put back in the bottle what we're really looking at is not stopping Iran from developing the ability to produce, but attempting to reduce their "breakout time." Our goal now is to find ways to stall and measure Iran's activities when they attempt to acquire the enriched resources they need to build a bomb. 

This requires diplomacy and negotiation - not confrontation.


What's critical now is convincing Tehran to accept inspections and verification procedures that would give the international community 6-12 months to spot threatening activities rather than the 2-4 months that we would have with no agreements. 

Again, this requires negotiation and diplomacy. 

If Prime Minister Netanyahu continues to label every option and plan presented by President Obama as a "bad deal" - which he did in front of Congress - it's up to him, as Allison points out, to come up with an alternative that "will make us all safer." 

Since he failed to do that yesterday, Netanyahu has done little except present Americans with a false choice built around deceit and desparation (especially given that Israel's intelligence agency has contradicted Netanyahu on his public comments). 

One final point. Prime Minister Netanyahu - and John Boehner - also succeeded in turning the U.S. Congress into a sensational political prop. Nice. 

- Mark 

Tuesday, March 3, 2015

THIS IS WHY WE REGULATE WALL STREET


Let's assume you have a retirement account. Should your financial adviser make investment decisions based on what's best for your financial future, or do what's best for the fee-based bottom line of Wall Street? Put another way, should financial advisers be obligated to keep your retirement accounts in low management fee accounts that generate returns that are best for you, or should they be free to steer you into higher fee accounts (like IRAs) that benefit them?

This is exactly the question discussed in "The Fight Over Protecting Your Retirement Savings." Incredibly, we learn that Wall Street is doing its level best to fight proposed Labor Department rules that would obligate the financial community to put your financial interests first.

How much could this impact your retirement? Plenty. Check it out.

Let's say that you're a young adult and shift jobs. You take your $25,000 401(k) retirement fund with you to your next job and add nothing else to the account. With projected yearly returns of 7%, and a 0.5% management fee, you should expect to have $227,000 by the time you retire in 35 years.

However, if a Wall Street adviser can convince you, or your financial manager, to stick your $25,000 into an IRA account that charges 1.5% in management fees things change drastically. Specifically, you will end up with $163,000 when you retire, which represents a 28% drop in your retirement account. Currently there is no penalty if the people managing your account do this.

The people on Wall Street want to keep it that way.

Most people would say that deliberately shifting you into a higher fee account that benefits your financial adviser(s) is just not right. Not so with Wall Street.


Wall Street lobbyists are effectively arguing that it's not their industry's responsibility to watch out for your best financial interests.

You can read the story here.

- Mark

If you're interested, here's the link to a three-part story I did a few years back on "The Stock Market vs. Social Security." Long story short? You're not always better off with your money in the market, especially with all the orchestrated bailouts Wall Street has needed since the 1980s. 

Monday, March 2, 2015

THESE "BLOWING UP THE BUDGET / GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN" TANTRUMS REEK OF FANATICISM

- Mark

THE CRUSADE TO PUT AMERICA INTO WAR, AGAIN


- Mark 

A BRIEF HISTORY OF LOUIS XIV ... OR, A SNAPSHOT OF THE MERCANTILIST STATE "MANAGING" TRADE

I'm posting what's below because I like the artwork. Since it's focused on life events surrounding France's Louis XIV (1638-1715) I've included some background, which also provides us with an idea of what the mercantilist era looked like. The excerpt is drawn from chapter 6 of my book, The Myth of the Free Market.

********************

A young Louis XIV at Versailles.

Throughout European history no monarch stands as tall as France’s King Louis XIV (1638-1715). Forced into the countryside as a young boy by the Wars of the Fronde, the Sun King grew to abhor disorder and uncertainty. Upon consolidating his personal authority at age nineteen – he had been king since age five – Louis XIV began centralizing state power.

But organizing and funding a seventeenth century state and its military was hampered by the chaos and costs associated with feudal habits, corrupt contractors, and crooked merchants, whose actions limited the king’s tax base. Louis XIV understood this and moved to professionalize and modernize France’s bureaucracy and economy.

This would have a ripple effect that would transform European state relations.

Jean Baptiste Colbert presents members 
of the Royal Academy of Sciences to Louis XIV, 1667.
To achieve his goals the Sun King looked to Jean Baptiste Colbert, who had an instinct for public policy. By subsidizing industries, negotiating treaties, raising tariffs to protect industry, and keeping private contractor corruption to a minimum, Colbert brought prosperity to France.

Because of Colbert’s policies France professionalized its military by standardizing uniforms, improve training protocols, and by offering better provisions. While Colbert’s emphasis on negotiation and commercial treaties led many to label him a Man of Peace, his aggressive trade and tariff policies irked neighbors and competitors alike.

In the process – and ironically – Colbert created “more enemies for France” than Louis XIV ever made with the sword. These dynamics, as Charles Tilly noted, created a powerful state which compelled others to pursue trade, adventure, and resources in ways that fostered European mercantilism.

The Persian embassy to Louis XIV.
Viewing the world in zero-sum terms – i.e. what you gain, I lose – conflict between European states rose to new levels as they competed for territory and markets throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.

As evidence, while France appeared undisturbed by fortresses built in the Spanish Netherlands along its northern borders (part of present day Belgium and Luxembourg) Colbert became concerned when Dutch and Flemish merchants in the region retaliated against his commercial policies. This convinced Colbert war was necessary. While conflict between France and Spain settled little  it raised concerns throughout Europe.

And with reason – Louis XIV had his eyes on Holland.

Four Day Battle in the Second Anglo-Dutch War.
In addition to opposing Holland’s democratic ideas, and Protestantism, the Dutch were prosperous and major commercial rivals. To solidify his military position the Sun King sought out the British as allies, who had their own reasons for fighting.

On the eve of the Second Anglo-Dutch War (1665-1667) British Admiral George Monk considered the motives, and  noted rather bluntly “What matters ‘this’ or ‘that’ reason? What we want is more of the trade which the Dutch now have.”

- Mark

Sunday, March 1, 2015

WHAT HAPPENED TO AMERICA'S MIDDLE CLASS? SENATOR WARREN EXPLAINS WHAT HAPPENED

Senator Elizabeth Warren explains what's happened to America's middle class in simple, easy to understand, language ...


- Mark